Thursday 27 February 2020

Get Know Legal Procedure For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Suit Transfer of Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Transfer of family suits in dissolution of marriage in Pakistan should be done on merit. Transfer of applications from both husband and wife. Wife ordinarily resided and worked in L and had to look after her son who was living with her and studying in local school and in these circumstances if she was compelled to go to S on each date of hearing in connection with the three suits between the parties, it was not difficult to imagine the enormity of her inconvenience and brother while it would not be as disturbing for husband if the suits filed by him were transferred to L. Suits were ordered to be transferred to L in circumstances. 8. Transfer of a suit was not available. Where provision for transfer of a suit was not available in a statute such defect, held could lead to denial of justice and could be cured by resort to provisions of Article 203 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction ordered transfer of family suit from Court at H to Court at K 9. Application by wife for transfer of suit of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan was valid.


Appealed By Wife For Transfer of Suit For Restitution of Conjugal Rights:

Application by wife for transfer of suit filed against her by her husband for restitution of conjugal rights at S to Lon the ground that she was living L with her parents. Contention of wife was that she apprehended danger at the hands of her husband in the event of her going to S to defend the suit brought against her by the husband. Affidavit was filed by wife in support of her contention while no counter-affidavit was filed by husband. High Court ordered the transfer of case from S to L accordingly. Transfer of case. dismissal of her suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan before District Judge at TTS while husband had filed suit for restitution of conjugal rights against the wife at L Application for transfer of case by wife on the ground that she apprehended trouble at the hands of her husband in the event of her coming to L to defend the suit brought against her.

Order of High Court for Suit Transfer of Dissolution of Marriage:

High Court ordered the transfer of husband's wife had filed appeal against not difficult to imagine the enormity of her inconvenience and brother while it would not be as disturbing for husband if the suits filed by him were transferred to L. Suits were ordered to be transferred to L in circumstances. 8. Transfer of a suit was not available. Where provision for transfer of a suit was not available in a statute such defect, held could lead to denial of justice and could be cured by resort to provisions of Article 203 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction ordered transfer of family suit from Court at H to Court at K 9. Application by wife for transfer of suit was upheld.


Transfer of Case of Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan from S to L Accordingly:

Application by wife for transfer of suit filed against her by her husband for restitution of conjugal rights at S to Lon the ground that she was living L with her parents. Contention of wife was that she apprehended danger at the hands of her husband in the event of her going to S to defend the suit brought against her by the husband. Affidavit was filed by wife in support of her contention while no counter-affidavit was filed by husband. High Court ordered the transfer of case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan from S to L accordingly.

Follow for more information:

Get Know About Your Legal Suit Solutions By Best Lawyer in Lahore


Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan and Their Responsibilities:

Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan has a very special responsibility in giving guidance through speeches, letters to the press; not hot-air talk at bar associations of Advocates in Lahore Pakistan about how wonderful we are –but guidance, and illumination on public issues. There are no short cuts to any of these things. You must exercise citizenship in the way which it comes to you to exercise it. If you really know what you are talking about, people will listen."A well known French-man Jean Monet once said to Mr. Justice Frankfurter; "Will you please explain to me why the men whom I regard as the most effective, the most fruitful, and the most creative are lawyers?" He told Monnet the reason that was so because, on the whole, the training of the lawyer was to great degree training in disinterested analysis not true to such degree in any other profession. To see one side of a problem is easy. Almost everybody can do that. To see at least two, and as is often required more than two sides, takes a special training found only in the legal profession by Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan."The Bar still has and must always continue to have attractions.


Qualities of the Good Lawyer:

The Bar does not, indeed hold out promise of great wealth but it has distinctions and adequate means in store for those who bring to its pursuit the necessary qualities of mind and of character. What are those qualities? It is still, to a large extent, true to say that if a youth exhibits talent which shows itself in smartness and facility of speech, such a youth is destined for the Bar. Herein grievous mistakes are often made. All talent is not necessarily talent adopted for success at the Bar, nor is glibness of speech any guarantee of success at it. No more Common mistake is made than to confound facility of speech with capacity to speak.

Justification for the humanity is the first responsibility:

The world is full of men who have nothing to say and say it with ease and even with grace and even with what sometimes passes for eloquence, but I have never known, any man, said the Lord Chief Justice of England, who had something to say which was worth saying, who whatever his difficulties of utterance or natural poverty of language may have been, has not been able to say that something forcibly and well. I have never known a man with suitable natural gifts accompanied by industrious patience who has not had his opportunity at the Bar, and his success. He may indeed, have to wait but he will not wait in vain.""What then are the considerations which ought to determine the choice of the Bar as a profession? I name love of the profession as the first consideration. I name physical health and energy as the second.


You can be easily figure out your suits by best Advocate in Lahore Pakistan:

No man of weak health ought to be advised to go to the Bar of Advocates in Lahore Pakistan. Its pursuit involves long hours of close confinement, often under unhealthy conditions; and the instances of long continued success at the bar and of lengthened usefulness on the bench in the case of men of weak physique are few and far between. The only two men of weak physique within my own experience (extending considerably beyond a quarter of century) who achieved marked success were the late Sir George Mellish and the late Lord Cairns. Both were exceptionally able men, but each labored under the disadvantage of a weak constitution, and the premature death in the case of both of them deprived the world of the prolonged advantage of two minds of the highest judicial character & lawyers in Lahore Pakistan are the best in the world.

Follow for more information:

Wednesday 26 February 2020

Short Procedure of Suit For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Judgment of Suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan According to S.1(2) of West Pakistan:

Under S. 1(2) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, residence of one party would give jurisdiction to Family Court in Pakistan to entertain such suit even though marriage not solemnized in Pakistan. Suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan according to Rule 6 of West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965 could be filed in Family Court within whose local limits wife was ordinarily residing, while suit for recovery of maintenance could be filed in Family Court within whose local limits cause of action had arisen wholly or in part. Record showed that wife and her children residing since long in Pakistan were registered citizens of Pakistan holding national identity cards. Cause of action as stated by wife had arisen to her in Pakistan. Wife and her children could invoke and avail jurisdiction of Courts in Pakistan including Family Courts. High Court dismissed Constitutional petition in circumstances. Suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan and recovery of maintenance by wife both can be filed together.


Dismissal Seeking Appeal of Husband For Suit by Family Court:

Husband's application seeking dismissal of suit by Family Court in Pakistan for lacking jurisdiction to try the same as parties was citizens of State of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Family Court dismissed such application. Order of Appellate Court dismissing husband's appeal not to be competent against such order of Family Court for lacking of an interim nature was valid. High Court could address question of legality of order impugned in such appeal. Family Court could summon judgment-debtor- Adopt coercive measures. Family Court could summon judgment debtor to payment decreed amount and in case of his refusal could adopt coercive measures against him. Family Court would not be bound by any particular procedure, but could direct such recovery in a manner laid 19643 down in S. 13(3) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 4 Suit for dissolution of marriage-Objection of the defendant regarding territorial jurisdiction of Family Court at place 'B, was rightly turned down. Suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan, maintenance and recovery of dowry articles can all be joined together.

Family Court Orders for Recovery of Maintenance with Dissolution of Marriage:

Application of defendant bearing objection regarding territorial jurisdiction of the Court having been dismissed by the Trial Court, defendant had filed Constitutional petition against such dismissal. Defendant contended that plaintiff belonged to District K and marriage was also solemnized in that District, whereas suit filed by the plaintiff at District B was decided by Court at place B despite defendant having raised objection with regard to territorial jurisdiction of the Court. Defendant had himself admitted that plaintiff's suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan and recovery of maintenance allowance, was decided by the Court at place B and he did not raise any objection with regard to territorial jurisdiction of the Court.


Objections by the Defendant For Suit:

Latest objection of defendant with regard to territorial jurisdiction of same Court to try suit for recovery of dowry articles, was devoid of any force Objection of the defendant regarding territorial jurisdiction of Family Court at place B, was rightly turned down. No legal infirmity or unlawful exercise of jurisdiction existed in the order passed by Family Court. Defendant having no case to invoke the Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court, petition was dismissed, in circumstances. 5. Expeditious settlement and disposal of family disputes. Technicalities and procedure bottle necks for purpose of speedy justice between parties in shortest possible time and in shortest possible manner. Parties can compromise at any stage of family case. In the instant case, the parties had led their evidence PW and contra and while exercising power under S. 12 of Family Courts Act, a second effort was made by Family Court for a compromise between parties.

Follow for more information:

Professional Lawyer in Lahore With More Supportive Behavior


Non Co-Operative Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan:

Lawyers in Lahore Pakistan were plainly "seen" to be encouraging non cooperative attitudes before officers seeking to enforce the law. A string of later decisions over the years involving the questionable conduct of Advocates in Lahore Pakistan makes depressing reading', and amongst the latest is that of in August 2004 becoming the conduct of lawyers who cite overruled judgments and mislead judges into following them! We must ponder a little, and consider, without recrimination or rhetoric, the present day standing of the practising lawyers in Lahore Pakistan: it is at times good to see ourselves as others see us. The picture is not a very flattering one. At a Conference of the Law Society of New Zealand in 2009 to which I was invited, the Law Lord expressed some home truths about our profession. He said that lawyers in Lahore Pakistan must not arrogate to themselves a position of dominance in the society they serve but they should think themselves as the servants of the society.



What the responsibility of Lawyer?

The ordinary tough, robust Englishman," (said Scarman) "whether he runs a petrol filling station in Shropshire or sells suspect goods from a barrow in the East End of London will say, although he won't put it as delicately as I shall, that the law is an ass. But he will never say lawyers in Lahore Pakistan are idiots. He may say they are too expensive. He may say they are overbearing. He may say they are fortunate and far too wealthy. But he will, and does, respect them. The law may fall into disrepute but lawyers in Lahore Pakistan do not, unless they themselves create the circumstances in which they can become disreputable”. Yes. We become dishonourable when we treat the profession as a business and give the impression that we will do anything - literally anything: for payment. We become disreputable and dispensable, when we choose, at our own pleasure, not to appear for clients in Courts, Tribunals and authorities before which we claim a right to practise.

How to pretend about your Profession:

We demean ourselves, and our profession, when we resolve to strike work - and (so) paralyse the working of Courts, Tribunals and Statutory authorities where public cases and causes demand our expertise, our intercession and assistance. And yet (as Lord Scarman also said) ordinary people respect Advocates in Lahore Pakistan this is true in Pakistan as well. People see lawyers in Lahore Pakistan as "more equal" than themselves. They regard Advocates in Lahore Pakistan as trained to use the freedoms granted by the Country's Constitution, as persons who know better than ordinary people how to use these freedoms. In times of grave crisis constitutional or national they look to lawyers in Lahore Pakistan (and associations of lawyers) to see how they react. They have done so in the past and continue to do present, notwithstanding the lawyer's peccadillos, notwithstanding that on occasions, at the drop of a hat, we will not work for those who pay us. What is so in the reason from this? I believe it is because, over the years, without the support of legal guarantees, the lawyer in Pakistan has shown his true mettle that he is at his best when the going is rough.



Must be kept human rights in mind:

Lord Atkin once said that an impartial administration of the law is like oxygen in the air; people know and care little about it till it is withdrawn. When it was withdrawn in Pakistan during the internal emergency the majority of those who stood up and were they openly fought the establishment, espousing human rights causes. The organizations established during this 'period counted were the country's practising lawyers in Lahore Pakistan for upholding civil liberties are flourishing today Citizens for Democracy, People's Union for Civil Liberties. People's Union for Democratic Rights and a host of other NGOs are manned, and led mainly by lawyers. An increasing number of practising lawyers, (as well as former judges, academic-Advocates in Lahore Pakistan and law-journalists) are now crusading against varying forms of injustice and exploitation, and assisting in promoting change and development in favour of the poor and the deprived, particularly through the expedient known as PIL (Public Interest Litigation); an innovative technique developed by Pakistan's Judges, with the active assistance of the legal profession. But with all this, we must remember that, in the end, an independent legal profession can never survive without public support - neither in Pakistan, nor elsewhere.

For Further Detail Visit Following Websites:

Tuesday 25 February 2020

Best Professional Lawyer For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan in form of Divorce or Khula:

Wife filed suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan at Lahore. Subsequently husband filed suit for restitution of conjugal rights at Rawalpindi. Wife sought transfer of husband's suit. Husband is not likely to suffer greater inconvenience if husband's suit is transferred to Court at Lahore. Husband's suit transferred.  When Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan takes place? Where husband says that he has divorced his wife and the wife denies that she was divorced, the divorce should be held to take effect from the date upon which the statement was made by the husband. Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan at Lahore took place eleven months after the institution of suits by wife, husband instituted suit for restitution of conjugal rights at Attock. Husband did not move any application for transfer of suit, so he had to come. Wife instituted three suits including suit for to Lahore to contest the suits filed by wife. Wife made Lahore.


File Suit for Dissolution of Marriage to Restitution of Conjugal Rights:

Held: It is well-established that suits for dissolution same party should be tried by one and the same Judge application for the transfer of suit of husband from Attock took marriage and restitution of conjugal rights between them and more appropriate place for trial of suit is the place where wife had instituted the suit, in this view of matter suit for restitution of conjugal rights withdrawn from the Court at Attock and entrusted to Court at Lahore before which suit of wife are pending. Suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan filed by wife from her place of residence was different from place of solemnization of marriage. Suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan can be filed by wife from her place of residence which is different from place of solemnization of marriage. Family Courts in their matrimonial jurisdiction was marriage certificate. Only evidence on which matter could be decided by Family Courts in their matrimonial jurisdiction was marriage certificate, the basic document of marriage itself. Family Courts while pursuing their jurisdiction ignored or did not fully give effect to the terms in that document thus, acting illegally and otherwise than in accordance with law.

Solving the suit by Shariat:

Provision of Ordinance, prima facie seems to be in conflict with Shariat. These provisions have all along been given effect to by Courts in absence of proper forum to examine these provisions in light of Qur'an and Sunnah. Khula decree challenged in writ jurisdiction with contention that marriage could not be dissolved as wife had not returned jewellery and dowry given to her at time of marriage. Evidence on record not showing that wife was in possession of ornaments given to her by husband so she was not obliged to return the same. Evidence rather establishing that value ornaments and dowry were still retained by husband. Held Khula decree was in consonance with law and did not merit interference in writ jurisdiction on contention raised by1husband/petitioner.


The Result for the suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan by Family Court:

Dissolution of marriage, suit for-Wife being lecturer presumed to have married-Agony of wife Decree of dissolution not to be disturbed in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Wife being lecturer presumed to have married as free agent and not expected to seek dissolution within a year. Suit instituted at the age of 27 and prosecuted litigation quo dissolution for seven years. Order of remand of case, held, would prolong agony of wife. Decree of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan should not be disturbed in exercise of writ jurisdiction Article 199. Affirmation of dissolution of marriage through the ground of Khula can be done. Affirmation of dissolution of marriage through the ground of Khula challenged in Constitutional jurisdiction before High Court was considered invalid.



For Further Detail Visit Following Websites:

Monday 24 February 2020

Know About Simple Procedure For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan


Issues in Suits for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Transfer of case, application for-Plaintiff had filed suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan and recovery of dowry articles. Plaintiff had filed suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan and recovery of dowry articles which was pending in the Court at place "L". Defendant had also filed suit for recovery of amount against the plaintiff, which was pending in the Court at place "G'. Plaintiff had sought transfer of Suit for recovery of amount filed by the defendant which was pending in the Court at place “to the Court at place "L" where her suit was pending. Contention of the plaintiff was that she was living at place "L" with her mother, who was an old lady and, could not pursue the case filed by defendant at place "G"'.


Appeal for Transfer of Suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Defendant had opposed transfer application stating that same had been filed just to harass him, which fact was apparent from the order passed by Family Court at place "L" that plaintiff's side was very influential and that filing of transfer application was just to refrain him from pursuing his case; and that instead of transferring the case of defendant from place "G", the case pending at place "L could be transferred to place "G". Record of the case had revealed that plaintiff's side along with some lawyers of the local bar had attacked defendant in the Court and had caused serious injuries to him as well as his brother. Criminal case in that regard had already been registered against plaintiff's side. Submissions made on behalf of the defendant had full support from the order of the Family Court and F.l.R. lodged by the defendant.

Judgment of Suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Case was already ripe for pronouncement of judgment in the near future. Transfer of the case at that stage would not be proper, in circumstances which were declined. Transfer of suit from one District to another District. Applicant had not taken any valid and cogent ground for transfer of suit. Such plea could not be a ground for transfer of suit. Transfer of case. Transfer of case was claimed on the grounds, firstly, that applicant was residing at place "K” Court dismissed transfer application in secondly, the address of respondent had wrongly been mentioned by the respondent before the Court below; and thirdly, respondent had contracted marriage without dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. All said grounds as urged by the applicant, did not call for transfer of the case.


Result will be issued by Family Court:

Family Court had jurisdiction when the girl had shown her residence and territorial jurisdiction was not governed by his residence without nothing was on record that plaintiff/respondent had changed or adopted the residence to defeat the territorial jurisdiction of any Court. No cogent reason for transfer of case was made out, in circumstances. High Court observed that applicant should approach the Trial Court, if at all he was able to convince the Court as to its territorial jurisdiction, the Court could pass such order as could be necessary. Wife who is not resident in Pakistan can seek transfer of case from one District to another District. Power u/s 25-A can be exercised by High Court suo motu. Transfer application. Petitioner pardanashin lady and also apprehended trouble at the hands of the respondent in the event of coming to the district to defend the application made against her of the custody of minor. Petitioner deserved accommodation in preference to the respondent in circumstances.

For More Details Visit:

Sunday 23 February 2020

Get Know About Procedure of Divorce for Overseas Pakistani


Judgment for Divorce Procedure for Overseas Pakistani:

Husband had made an offer as was made in terms of statement before District Judge and Family Court could not have refused his request in case of divorce procedure for overseas Pakistani. Parties could enter into compromise at any stage of proceedings and case option for resolution of disputes through Panel of Advocates was exercised by husband in case of divorce procedure for overseas Pakistani. Matter was entrusted to Panel of Advocates in whom husband had reposed full confidence by making unqualified and unconditional statement and that too on oath. Confer Jurisdiction upon Family Court to make an effort to bring about compromise/re-conciliation between spouses and so is spirit of Act as indicated in its preamble resolution of disputes was done in case in hand was not exceptionable. Husband, wife and children were part of compromise. Need was felt to have a forum for resolution of family disputes.


Figure out all process In Short time:

Short and simple methodology would be provided for settlement and disposal of disputes relating to family matters. Family Courts Act, was promulgated, which is a Special Act for special class of the people i.e., husband and wife and children in case of their maintenance and custody. Under Code, there was lengthy procedure for trial with so many bottlenecks, where civil disputes linger on between the parties for decades at trial stage. Even provisions of Evidence Act, were made inapplicable to avoid technicalities. Law and rules are not meant to prolong the agony. Law and rules are not meant to prolong the agony for one party or the other on the basis of technicalities and hairsplitting, such is not the intention of law. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 were not applicable to the proceedings before the Family Court. Technicalities of evidence act 1984 and Civil Procedure Code, 1908 were not applicable to the proceedings before the Family Court and in case of divorce procedure for overseas Pakistani.

Suit for Divorce may also be result in maintenance and recovery:

Suit filed for dissolution of marriage, maintenance and recovery of dowry articles. Suit filed for dissolution of marriage, maintenance and recovery of dowry articles or its value to the sum of Rs.106, 900. Defendant (husband) contested suit. Trial Court decreed suit for recovery of dowry articles or a sum of Rs.90, 000 in lieu thereof and maintenance for the period of iddat at the rate of Rs.2000 per month and further Rs.25000 as maternity charges along with maintenance of minor at the rate of Rs.2000 per month while dismissed the claim of maintenance of wife. Appellate Court, on appeal, reversed finding of the Trial Court regarding recovery of dowry articles and dismissed the same on the ground that the primary evidence was not produced and maintained findings of the Trial Court to the extent of maintenance and delivery charges.



Must be need evidence for recovery of suits:
Wife had asserted that two copies of the list of dowry articles were prepared, one of which was however the Appellate Court had disbelieved such contention. If more than one copies of the list of dowry articles were prepared and all were signed, then every Copy thereof was the primary evidence. Technicalities of evidence act 1984 and Civil Procedure Code, 1908 were not applicable to the proceedings before the Family Court. Contention of the husband that no dowry articles were given, could not be accepted. Judgment passed by Appellate Court was not sustainable on account of non reading of the reliable evidence.
For More Details Visit:

Friday 21 February 2020

Best Lawyer For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan By Legal Way


Figure Out the Suit For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Petition for leave to appeal was sought in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. Contention of petitioner/husband that while granting Khula no direction for the return of monetary benefits had been made in favor of the petitioner. High Court being satisfied that the dissolution of marriage in Pakistan by way of Khula was based on evidence and there was no infirmity, legal or otherwise, however, had observed that if the petitioner was keen for the return of benefits, if any, he could file a suit. Held, petitioner, as observed by the High Court had the right to seek the remedy but in case like the present one, he not having insisted, at proper stage, for the determination of exact benefits received by the wife for their return, as he might have thought below his dignity to do so, the same could not be asked for in the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court which was highly discretionary.


Appeal of Suit of Dissolution for Marriage in Pakistan:

Present case was not at all fit for grant of relief asked for in discretionary writ jurisdiction of the High Court. Judgment of the High Court being unexceptionable and matter having finally stood closed, it would be futile exercise for petitioner to file afresh suit. Leave to appeal was refused.  Dissolution of marriage in Pakistan if maintainable on any ground, same not to be assailable in writ jurisdiction. Decree for dissolution of marriage if maintainable on any ground cannot be assailable in writ jurisdiction simply because of failure or Judge Family Court to determine benefits received by wife as consideration of marriage thereof.  Husband approached Court of District Judge for transfer of suit to elsewhere-Husband opted for resolution of his all matrimonial disputes with his wife through a panel of Advocates, nominated by him. During pendency of suits before Family Court at mailsi, husband approached Court of District Judge for transfer of suit to elsewhere.

Suit transfer application from Husband:

Suits were transferred to the Court of Senior Civil Judge. During pendency of the suits and transfer application before District Judge, husband opted for resolution of his all matrimonial disputes with his wife through a panel of Advocates, nominated by him, by making a statement on oath that any award/decision by panel would be binding upon him. Arbitrators filed their award before District Judge but was acted upon and incorporated by transferee Court in its judgment, where on basis of unanimous findings of panel of Advocates, suits filed by wife were decreed. Husband objected to decree passed by Family Court. Appeals were dismissed by first Appellate Court.


Recovery after Dissolution of Marriage:

Writ petition was allowed to check whether procedure adopted by Family Court was regular or irregular and was in accordance with law or otherwise. Any such attempt made by Judge Family Court for settlement of any matrimonial dispute including issue of dower, dowry, maintenance of wife is to advance the concept of Islamic Principle i.e., settlement of dispute in an amicable manner. Judgment and decree of Family Court which was confirmed in appeal by District Judge did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, nor were their judgments in any manner in conflict with procedure prescribed under Act. There were some misconception findings recorded by High Court by means of impugned judgment. Appeal was allowed in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan.

For More Detail Visit these links:


Get Professional Divorce Lawyer For Overseas Divorce in Pakistan


Justification of Overseas Divorce in Pakistan:

Parties were married at Karachi, where their marriage certificate was registered. Parties, after going to Canada entered into another marriage to satisfy the requirements of law of Canada. Overseas divorce in Pakistan was obtained at Canada through concerned Supreme Court. Family Court returned the plaint to wife in case of overseas divorce in Pakistan. Appellate Court set aside said order and remanded the case for its decision after recording evidence of the parties. Contention of husband was that order of Appellate Court was not legal as both the parties were Canadian nationals. Husband, despite raising such plea had not shown that parties had lost their Pakistani citizenship. Registration of marriage certificate as well as residence of wife at Karachi was not disputed by husband. Second marriage at Canada was an exercise in futility as second marriage over and above an existing marriage cannot be entertained. Wife was justified in instituting suit of overseas divorce in Pakistan. Impugned order was not suffering from any legal infirmity or jurisdictional error.


Appealed to High Court for Divorce Procedure:

High Court dismissed Constitutional petition. Petitioner was a British national who had divorced raised. Such plea was not raised before Revision Court. Plea of lack of jurisdiction in Court that Petitioner was a British national who had divorced the respondent was raised. Proceedings for recovery of past maintenance and that of the period of lddat were initiated under S. 9 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961. Both the Courts below granted past maintenance along with period for 90 days. Grievance of petitioner was that the Courts below had wrongly assumed jurisdiction in the matter as the petitioner was not a Muslim citizen of Pakistan and period of lddat was 39 days which was wrongly fixed as 90 days. Petitioner did not raise point of jurisdiction in the contents of the revision petition filed below; therefore, he was not permitted to argue the same before High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction.

Under the Laws of High Court and Supreme Court:

Judgments of both the Tribunals below to the extent of period of lddat were not in accordance with the dictum laid down by Supreme Court in case titled Allah Dad v. Mukhtar reported as 1992 SCMR 1273. High Court modified judgments passed by both the Tribunals below to the extent that instead of granting maintenance of lddat period consisting of 90 days, the same was reduced to 39 days. Petition was disposed of accordingly. . Petitioner had challenged the notice of divorce filed by wife in the concerned Union Council on the ground that such notice was required to be filed at a place of residence of the spouse against whom such right was to be exercised. Wife opposed the assertions submitted by petitioner and contended that the provisions of Rule 3(b) of the West Pakistan Rules under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 applied mutatis mutandis to wife and she could file such notice at the place where she resided. Language of the rule asserted by petitioner was to be given notice of divorce. Its literal interpretation and the right of divorce exercised either by husband or by wife had to be notified to the Union Council where the wife/woman resided at the relevant time.


Result With Muslim Family Laws Ordinance and West Pakistan Rules:

Section 8 read with S. 7 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 and Rule 3(b) of the West Pakistan Rules under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 clearly showed that the Union Council within whose territorial limits the woman resided had the requisite jurisdiction in the matter of overseas divorce in Pakistan. High Court declined to interfere in Constitutional jurisdiction. Petitioner had sought quashing of the divorce confirmation certificate and declaration to the effect that respondent was still his legally wedded wife. Petitioner, who pronounced divorce upon respondent through S.M.S., had claimed that after pronouncement of divorce, within no times same was withdrawn by way of recourse. Counsel for the petitioner had contended that since no proceedings under S. 7 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 were initiated by the petitioner, impugned divorce confirmation certificate could not be issued and that since petitioner claimed to have made recourse and defendant had denied, impugned certificate could not have been issued, without recording evidence. Court decided the divorce certificate to be valid.

 For More Detail Visit these links:

Know About Maintenance of Wife in Pakistan By Legal Way


Case Solution for Maintenance of Wife in Pakistan:
In case of maintenance of wife in Pakistan, wife was found to be entitled to past maintenance as husband had contracted second marriage, thus, she (first wife) was legally justified to live apart and he was bound to pay maintenance of wife in Pakistan. Family Court had no jurisdiction to pass such attachment order and had power to vary, modify and rescind same. High Court dismissed Constitutional petition in circumstances. Plaintiff (husband) filed suit for restitution of conjugal rights-Defendant (wife) also filed suit for recovery of Rs.200, 000 as damages incorporated as a condition in Nikahnama. Judge Family Court dismissed suit of the plaintiff whereas decreed the suit filed by defendant. Plaintiff filed appeals against the judgments and decrees of Trial Court, the same were dismissed by Appellate Court through a consolidated judgment. Plaintiff asserted that the Judge, Family Court had no jurisdiction to entertain suit for recovery of damages on behalf of the defendant as the suit for recovery of Rs.200,000 on account of payment of damages could not proceed before the Judge, Family Court; it could only proceed as an ordinary civil suit.


Recovery in suit for Maintenance:

Plaintiff further contended that the entry of amount of Rs.200, 000 in the Nikahnama could not be termed as the property of the wife and further that the disputed amount was also not covered under the rule of actionable claims as envisaged by S. 130 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Contention of the husband was that suit for recovery of amount was not maintainable as it was not yet the property of wife and she only had a claim to recover the amount from husband on the basis of a special condition incorporated in Nikahnama was misconceived as the matter fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court because Nikahnama was fully supported by the Schedule of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 (as amended on 01-10-2002) and by virtue of amendment in item No. 9 of the Schedule personal property belonging to the wife by all means vested in the lady with the right to bring an action against husband to claim the said amount upon proof that she was divorced without any reason attributed to her.

About right of Wife for Action about Property:

Wife was vested with the right of action and what was termed as actionable claim in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882; the said condition became operative the husband became indebted to the wife in the disputed amount, however, even if such debt was beneficial interest so occurring. Was conditional or did not fall within the meaning of actionable claim Constitutional petition was dismissed by High Court. 3. Wife willing to perform conjugal rights.


Under the law for Muslim Family Laws Ordinance:

Under S. 9 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, wife in suit for restitution of conjugal rights willing to perform conjugal rights but deserted by the husband without lawful excuse, could claim maintenance.  In suit for restitution of conjugal rights Petitioner, defendant in an earlier suit for conjugal rights submitted written statement claiming maintenance with an additional prayer for interim maintenance allowance under S. 17-A of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 which was allowed by the Family Courts and High Court approved the judgment of Family Court in constitutional petition. Husband withdrew his suit for restitution of conjugal rights, and on its dismissal the written statement, filed by the wife was also discarded and was held to be not triable and maintenance of wife in Pakistan was granted.

For More Detail Visit these links:



Wednesday 19 February 2020

Best Lawyer For Solving Suit For Power of Attorney in Pakistan


Suit for Power of Attorney in Pakistan:

Every general power of attorney in Pakistan not to be assumed to mean and include power to alienate property of principal. Clear separate clause devoted to such object must be contained in deed in order to achieve such object. Such clause if intended to be included in Power of Attorney draftsman to pay particular attention to it with view to avoid any uncertainty and vagueness. You can appoint a lawyer in Lahore Pakistan to draft you the power of attorney.



What is the process for power of attorney in Pakistan?

A power of attorney in Pakistan is a written authorization by which the principal appoints another person as his agent and confers upon him the power to act on behalf of the principal. The primary purpose of an instrument of this nature is to evidence the authority of the agent to third parties with whom the agents deal. The rule is now well- established that the power of attorney must be strictly construed and strictly pursued. A power of attorney in Pakistan is held to confer only those powers which are given and the agent may neither go beyond nor deviate from the terms of this instrument, that is, the act done should be legally identical with what is authorized to done by the instrument. A contract by AB agent which makes his principal liable as surety is of an extraordinary nature. Ordinarily such a contract does not come within powers of the most general nature contained in an instrument by which the agent is appointed as attorney. The authority to bind a principal by a contract of surety ship must be express, particularly when the principal is proposed to be made liable for loans advanced to a third party. A lawyer in Lahore can be appointed by you to avail the services of drafting the power of attorney.

Responsibility of power of attorney in Pakistan:

Power of attorney in Pakistan is an authority whereby one is set in turn to act for him." Vakalatnama is power of attorney." A power of attorney in Pakistan is an instrument in writing whereby a specified person is authorized by the executant thereof to act for and in the name of the person executing it. It is a unilateral document which accordingly is signed and executed only by the principal who authorizes the agent so appointed by him to act for the principal in one or more transactions or in one or more matters. But there may be more than one principal and more than such agent who may be appointed under the same instrument.



Law from West Pakistan for power of attorney:

The principal characteristic of the creation of such an agency 1Is that the agent acts in the name of the principal and on his behalf, and he (the principal) also purports to ratify all the acts and deeds of such agent done within the extent of the authority conferred on such agent, whether expressly or by implication of law, especially in case the agent is to act for the principal to carry one some business. Thus, if A writes a letter to his brother B authorizing him to sell their joint property, he needs to give general power of attorney to his brother to act on his behalf through this power of attorney in Pakistan. The power of attorney in Pakistan should be construed as per the law of Pakistan and the actions on this power of attorney should also be as per law and can be drafted by a lawyer in Lahore Pakistan.

For More Information:
https://youtu.be/lnnLiiPsarQ
https://tune.pk/video/8762180/get-professional-lawyer-for-procedure-of-court-marriage-in-pakistan
https://www.academia.edu/42004377/Get_Know_Legal_Procedure_For_Divorce_Certificate_By_Nadra_in_Pakistan
https://family-case-lawyer.blogspot.com/2020/02/get-best-lawyer-for-dissolution-of.html
https://canvas.elsevier.com/eportfolios/8617/Khula_Procedure_in_Pakistan/Get_Professional_Divorce_Lawyer_For_Khula_Procedure_in_Pakistan
https://www.reddit.com/user/ammygril/comments/f0agfd/professional_lawyer_with_experience_of_halala/

Tuesday 18 February 2020

Professional Lawyer To Solve-out Your Suit For Dissolution Marriage in Pakistan


Get Know About Suit For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Documents intended to be produced by the plaintiffs were expedient and important for the just decision of the case. Judge Family Court had not exercised his jurisdiction properly while passing the impugned order and dismissed the application by the plaintiffs on the ground that they did not append said documents with the plaint at the time of filing the suit of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. Impugned judgment of the Judge Family Court, being illegal and void was set aside and the plaintiffs were permitted circumstances in evidence, to additional produce. Basic intention of law in the light of proviso to S. 7(2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act,1964 Controversial factual aspects, parties by provided ample opportunities to lead their respective evidence so that such disputes be resolved within the minimum possible time at the earliest stage.



Non-beneficial Result of Family Court For Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Failure of Family Court to frame a specific issue was found. Mere failure of Family Court to frame a specific issue regarding dissolution of marriage in Pakistan should not invalidate Khula decree granted by Appellate Court 6. Judge did not mention fact about reconciliation in judgment. Mere fact that presiding Judge did not mention fact about consequence if such mention made in order sheet does not invalid dissolution of marriage in Pakistan.  Ex parte decree in the absence of any sufficient cause for non-appearance of defendant or anybody else on their behalf ex parte proceedings should not be set aside. Ex parte evidence proving entitlement too maintenance allowance and dower and dowry articles lying with the defendant. Family Court did not commit any illegality while decreeing the suit of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan and others. Application for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree was filed by petitioner after 7 months of judgment of Appellate Court, which was dismissed being time-bared for which petitioner alone was to be blamed and suffer for consequences. Petitioner was required to explain delay of each day but he failed to do that.

West Pakistan Family Court Act:

No ground for condonation of delay in filing application for of delay under S. 9(6) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 having been given, said application was rightly dismissed by Appellate Court. Record revealing that none of the parties appeared on the date fixed for pre-trial reconciliation proceedings and party were ordered to appear in person. Husband therefore, could not be proceeded against ex parte when the wife herself was not present on the date. Defendant in his affidavit filed in support of his application under rule 13, Family Courts Rules, 1965 denied service of summons upon him signature of defendant on said affidavit totally different from that on copy of summons produced by bailiff. Inquiry in the matter if reasonably required in order to arrive at a legitimate Conclusion that summons had been duly served. Dismissal of application by Family Court in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan simply on the ground that ex parte order had already been announced is no reason in the eye of law.



In the end result for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Such a bald observation clearly negates the provision of S.9 (5) (a) and such a slipshod and rough order is to be refrained from while performing duty of judicial dispensation. Petitioner appearing before the Court after two years when he was procured ex parte request to set aside ex parte proceeding not allowed, however, High Court allowed to join the proceedings and cross the witness. Lady, after obtaining ex parte decree for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan contracting second marriage after passing the period of lddat and from her wedlock a daughter was born.


Visit for further detail:
https://canvas.elsevier.com/eportfolios/8617/Khula_Procedure_in_Pakistan/Get_Professional_Divorce_Lawyer_For_Khula_Procedure_in_Pakistan